IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2001
ACTION
NO. 62
BETWEEN
|
(ROGER
TRAPP |
PLAINTIFF |
|
(
(
( And
(
( |
|
|
(ISABEL
GOLDBERG |
DEFENDANT |
Mr. L. Welch for Applicant
Mr. Chebat for Respondent
Judgment: Ex Tempore
J U D G M E N T
Notes: |
Special
leave to appeal the judgment of a District Court out of
time, O. 73 r9 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules. The applicant
unavoidably prevented from giving notice within 21 days.
Judgment of the District Court not pronounced in court
or on a date notified, S:25 of the District Courts Act,
Cap. 74. |
Mr. Roger
Trapp, an intending appellant has applied on 6.2.2001, under
O. 73 r 9 (1) of the Supreme Court Rules for
special leave to appeal out of time allowed for noting appeal.
That was necessary because under O. 73 r 2 (a),
an intending appellant must lodge notice of appeal with the
clerk of the District Court and with the Registrar of the
Supreme Court, within 21 days after the decision has been
pronounced in the District Court.
From
the scanty information in the affidavits of the applicant
and of Mr. Leslie Smith, who was the plaintiff at the District
Court, the judgment was a money sum. The District Court has
been unable to provide written judgment or notes of the proceeding.
The applicant says that after the hearing he went to the District
Court several times to receive the judgment. The next thing
that happened was that he received summons to appear in Court
for examination as to his means to satisfy the judgment debt.
He inquired from his attorney who told him that the judgment
had been given in writing. The affidavit of the applicant
was not contradicted.
It must
be concluded that judgment was not pronounced in Court at
the same sitting when the trial was concluded or on a future
date notified to the applicant, as required by S:25
of the District Courts Procedure Act, Cap. 74 of the Statute
Laws of Belize. The applicant was left to find out
when judgment would be pronounced. In my view he was unavoidably
prevented from appealing because the District Court did not
pronounce the judgment on the same day the trial was concluded
and in the alternative, did not notify the applicant of the
date the judgment would be pronounced.
I do
not think that the question of the right of the applicant
to appeal for the first time arises. He would not require
leave.
There
is a matter of concern in this case. The plaintiff at the
District Court has not been able to find any written judgment
or any notification of it in the record. It is a matter which
the Chief Magistrate should look into.
The
application for leave to appeal out of time is allowed. In
view of the fault being that of the District Court, no order
as to costs is made against the respondent.
Delivered
this Friday the 6th day of July, 2001.
At the
Supreme Court,
Belize City.
Sam
Lungole Awich
Judge
|