|
(ARTURO
MATUS |
APPELLANT |
BETWEEN |
(
(AND
( |
|
|
(ALFRED
MELHADO |
RESPONDENT
|
Court
of Appeal
Civil Appeal No. 4 of 1992
15th December, 1992
S. PONNAMBALAM
Mr. Fred
Lumor for the Appellant.
Mr. Eamon Courtenay for the Respondent.
Civil
practice and procedure - Application to file Notice of Appeal
out of time - Rule 3(3) of the Court of Appeal Rules - Judge
may extend time within which an appeal may be brought provided
the application is made within one month of the expiration
of time so prescribed - Application of section 43 of the
Court of Appeal Act - Section only applies to criminal appeals.
J
U D G M E N T
Pursuant
to section 17(3) of the Court of Appeal Act, the Defendant/Appellant,
as Applicant took out summons for an order for an extension
of time to file a Notice of Appeal against an order made by
me in Chambers on 12th March, 1992. Since the learned counsel
for the Plaintiff/Respondent indicated that he would be taking
an in limine objection on the jurisdictional ground,
both counsel were requested to make their submissions in writing,
which they have done.
The objection
of the counsel for the Plaintiff/Respondent is based on two
grounds and in my view he is entitled to succeed on both.
Firstly,
according to the Court of Appeal Rule 3(3), a judge of the
Court may extend the time prescribed in paragraph (1) within
which an appeal may be brought, provided an application is
made within one month of the expiration of the time so prescribed.
The present application now made is clearly months outside
the time period provided by this Rule. Therefore I have no
power to grant the application and it must therefore fail.
Secondly,
the Defendant/Appellant, in his submission specifically states
that he is making his application under section 43 of the
Court of Appeal Act. And he goes on to argue at length that
this section applies. But I find myself in agreement with
the contention of the counsel for the Plaintiff/Respondent
that section 43 applies only to criminal appeals, as is the
whole of Part IV of the Act. This is made clear by the opening
provisions of section 14(l) of Part III of the Act.
The Application
of the Defendant/Appellant therefore fails and is accordingly
dismissed.
----------OO----------
|