IN
THE MATTER of the Arbitration Act,
Chapter 69 of the Laws of Belize, 1990
IN THE MATTER of an Arbitration
|
(JOHN
C. ROBERSON
(RUTH E. ROBERSON
(GERALD J. McDERMOTT
(LINDA J. McDERMOTT |
CLAIMANTS |
BETWEEN |
(
(AND
( |
|
|
(BIRGIT
WALLRAF
(MICHAEL WALLRAF
(Carrying on Business as
(MAYA RANCH LIMITED |
RESPONDENTS |
Supreme
Court
Action No. 492 of 1999
22nd March, 2000.
Shanks, J.
Mr. Wilfred
Elrington, S.C. for the Claimants
Mr. Denys Barrow, S.C. for the Respondents.
Application
for leave to appeal against interlocutory decision - Court
previously granting leave with conditions - Uncertainty
of whether court had power to grant leave with conditions
- Authorities on this point unclear - Court granting leave
to appeal against decision to grant leave in the first instance
with conditions.
J
U D G M E N T
This is
an application for leave to appeal against a decision of mine
where I gave leave to appeal to Mr. Barrow in this arbitration
matter subject to certain conditions.
The imposition
of these conditions has, it seems, caused a certain amount
of trouble and it seems that Mr. Barrow wishes to appeal to
the Court of Appeal to say I have no jurisdiction to impose
the conditions and that the conditions imposed were too onerous.
It seems
to me that the proper way to bring this before the Court of
Appeal is to ask them to review my decision on the application
for leave to appeal in the same way as if I had refused leave
altogether, the Court of Appeal can be asked to review the
matter. However, I understand that the Court of Appeal has
indicated otherwise and that Mr. Barrow must therefore appeal
against the decision.
I am,
therefore, asked to grant leave for that appeal. The authorities
indicating that there is jurisdiction to impose conditions
have been shown to me but one of them talks about a certain
condition like the one I imposed being unusual, and the other
say that this is exceptional, if there is jurisdiction at
all. It seems to me that the whole matter should indeed be
reviewed by the Court of Appeal to see what kind of conditions
can be imposed on a leave application and that if I don't
grant leave to appeal this time, the matter will get lost
in a quite unnecessary procedural wrangle.
In order
to cut through such a wrangle I therefore grant Mr. Barrow
leave to appeal against the imposition of conditions on my
last grant of leave to appeal. In doing so, I wish to emphasize
that I am expressing no view whatsoever as to the merits of
his appeal. I hope these reasons are sufficient for the Court
of Appeal to now review this matter provided, of course, that
they have time to do so.
----------OO----------
|